Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Baucum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 14, 1960No. 13717PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

Appellee, A. T. Baucum, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason, that no notice of appeal was given in open court within ten days after the order overruling the motion for a new trial was rendered and no notice of appeal was filed with the clerk within ten days after such order was rendered, as is required by Rule 353 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion will be overruled. The record in this' case shows that the final judgment herein was signed and rendered on the first day of April, 1960. Thereafter, on April 11, 1960, defendants filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lucchese v. SpeciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Houston Life Insurance v. DabbsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Turner v. Texas Sportservice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Texas Van Lines, Inc. v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Martinez v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flowers v. MuseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Travelers Express Company, Inc. v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Ambassador Oil Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Hall v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Hilliard v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API