Legal Opinion

Cooper v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Criminal Court of Jefferson. Tried before the Hon. S. E. Greene.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of seduction. The indictment charges that the seduction was accomplished “by means of temptation, deception, arts, flattery, or a promise of marriage.” — Code of 1886, § 4015. The means relied on to procure a conviction in this case, was mainly an alleged promise of marriage. The only evidence that such promise was made, is the testimony of the woman who is charged to have been seduced. The statute provides that “no conviction shall be had under this section on the uncorroborated testimony of the woman, upon whom the seduction is charged.”

A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Leoni v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Suther v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Collum v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Tarver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API