Legal Opinion
In re Rogers Advertising, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1978Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
The substitute assignee, Harkow, has filed his final account and is seeking judicial settlement thereof, commissions and fees for his legal services rendered, disbursements and other relief. Among the other items of relief, he seeks a judicial determination as to the validity, correctness and liability of the sales tax, business tax and commercial occupancy tax claims of the City of New York.
The City of New York, Department of Finance (Finance Administration) opposes that part of the application of the substitute assignee which seeks a determination as to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Booth v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Booth v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- In re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Anderson's Farm Service, Inc., New York County Courts1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.