Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 2002No. Nos. F-2000-638, F-2000-194PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION

JOHNSON, Vice Presiding Judge.

T1 Due to the similarity of the issues raised, we have consolidated these cases to address (1) whether the district courts' assessments of incarceration costs were arbitrary and capricious, and (2) whether the assessment of incarceration costs violates an indigent defendant's right to equal protection and due process, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

I. Hubbard v. State, F-2000-638

{2 Ray Lamont Hubbard was tried by a jury in Choctaw County District Court, Case No. CF-1999-85, for Murder in the Second Degree, in violation of 21 0.8.1991, §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus of HumphreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. METOYER v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
  3. Cebon Wayne Pettie v. David Rogers, Interim WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  4. Nesbitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API