Legal Opinion · Dissent

Restaurant Enterprises, Inc. v. Sussex Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 3, 1968Published

1DissentHall, J.

The majority turns its disposition of this case on a holding that the provision of our standard fire insurance policy statute, N. J. S. A. 17:36 — 5.15 to 5.28, inclusive, prescribing the maximum duration of contracts of temporary insurance in the form of oral or written binders, N. J. S. A. 17:36-5.16, is not binding on the insured. It appears to me that it is not open to the judiciary thus to nul*79lify a patently plain legislative enactment, completely within the province of that branch of government to enact for whatever reason of public policy and interest it may have found compelling.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens Casualty Company of New York v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Eastern Shore of Virginia Fire Insurance v. KellamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  3. Rowell v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Rosen v. Colonial Cooperative InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API