Anderson School Township v. Milroy Lodge F. & A. M., No. 139
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant alleges in its complaint that it is the owner of the real estate in controversy, and prays partition. The substance of the answer of the appellee is this: The appellee agreed with the appellant and another person to purchase the land in dispute and to erect a building thereon; that the first story of the building should be owned and used by the appellant, the second story by the third person referred to, and that the third story should be owned and used by the appellee; that the appellant should have the control of the ground subject to the appellee’s right of ingress to and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baldwin v. . HumphreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- McConnel v. KibbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Russell v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barr v. LamasterNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Bercot v. VelkoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Board of Commissioners v. Lattas Creek Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Oliver v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Harwood v. MasqueletteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.