Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1997-1747Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BART. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 538] Attorneys at law — Misconduct — One-year suspension with credit for time served during interim suspension — Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. (No. 97-1747 — Submitted October 7, 1997 — Decided December 31, 1997.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners and Grievances of the Supreme Court, No. 96-97. On June 27, 1996, the United States Attorney charged respondent, David R. Bart of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney

Registration No. 0006559,

and seven others with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. BartOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re BartOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API