Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Proceedings to Compel McAuley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1979No. 39950Published

1DissentKrupansky, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority for the reasoning contained in the following opinion. Appellant, John Monica, who designates himself the real party in interest in the notice of appeal, contends the trial court erred in denying the application of the California court to compel Robert J. McAuley, appellee, to attend criminal discovery proceedings in California as a necessary and material witness. The majority reaches the merits of this claim. However, a preliminary issue is presented. On November 8,1978, Robert McAuley, appellee, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State of Oregon v. Blount, Sr.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State ex rel. Jones v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Cincinnati v. KelloggOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. City of Cincinnati v. KelloggOhio Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API