Legal Opinion

Schrewe v. New York Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1916No. Calendar No. 27,376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Frances Schrewe presented her claim against the New York Central Railroad Company for compensation for the death of her husband. From an award of an arbitration committee, respondent brings certiorari. On motion to dismiss the writ.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Part 3 of Act No. 10, Public Acts (Extra Session) 1912 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5454 et seq.), is entitled Procedure. If an injured employee and his employer or the indemnitor of the employer agree concerning the compensation to be paid the employee under the act, their agreement, reduced to writing, may be filed with the Industrial Accident Board, and,, if approved, is final and binding. If an agreement is not reached, the procedure is, first, the formation of a committee of arbitration, one member of which shall be a member of the Industrial Accident Board. The committee, having made an…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harlan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Crowe Glass Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Spada v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API