Legal Opinion

Taynton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1986No. Appeal, No. 1065 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

Petitioner, Robert E. Taynton, Jr., petitions for review of an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which accepted a stipulation submitted by petitioner and respondent, Unico Majik Markets, Inc., and indicated that the case was considered closed. We affirm the Board.

Petitioner filed a fatal claim petition based on a stipulation of facts submitted by the parties. The stipulation reveals that petitioners daughter, Shelly Lynn Taynton, was employed by respondent as a clerk in one of its stores. Ms. Taynton was a twenty-one year old college…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ottavi v. Timothy Burke Stripping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Morris v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Zahrobsky v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Decker v. Mohawk Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Broadwood Chuckwagon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riemenschneider, S. v. Sabatelli, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API