Taynton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Kalish,
Petitioner, Robert E. Taynton, Jr., petitions for review of an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which accepted a stipulation submitted by petitioner and respondent, Unico Majik Markets, Inc., and indicated that the case was considered closed. We affirm the Board.
Petitioner filed a fatal claim petition based on a stipulation of facts submitted by the parties. The stipulation reveals that petitioners daughter, Shelly Lynn Taynton, was employed by respondent as a clerk in one of its stores. Ms. Taynton was a twenty-one year old college…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ottavi v. Timothy Burke Stripping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Morris v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Zahrobsky v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Decker v. Mohawk Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Broadwood Chuckwagon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Riemenschneider, S. v. Sabatelli, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022