Christian v. Mahfouz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover an indebtedness of $579.47, and had his property attached on the grounds set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 of article 240 of the Code of Practice. The sheriff, according to his returns, attached, along with other property on April 6th, “74 peeled, pine pilings, located on the right-of-way of the Texas & Pacific Railway at South Mansfield, Louisiana,” as the property of defendant.
Joe and T. Mahfouz intervened in the suit, claiming a privilege on the piling by virtue of a chattel mortgage thereon executed previous to the attachment. Bert Winkler also intervened,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Durel v. BuchananSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of McCannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Commercial Bank v. SimmondsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- All State Credit Plan Houma, Inc. v. FournierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Abbott v. TempleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954