Legal Opinion

Christian v. Mahfouz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1929No. 3602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover an indebtedness of $579.47, and had his property attached on the grounds set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 of article 240 of the Code of Practice. The sheriff, according to his returns, attached, along with other property on April 6th, “74 peeled, pine pilings, located on the right-of-way of the Texas & Pacific Railway at South Mansfield, Louisiana,” as the property of defendant.

Joe and T. Mahfouz intervened in the suit, claiming a privilege on the piling by virtue of a chattel mortgage thereon executed previous to the attachment. Bert Winkler also intervened,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durel v. BuchananSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of McCannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Commercial Bank v. SimmondsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. All State Credit Plan Houma, Inc. v. FournierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Abbott v. TempleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API