Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Hankook Tire Manufacturing Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1996No. 17808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

Defendants Hankook Tire Manufacturing Company and Ronald Kennedy have appealed from an order of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that denied their consolidated motion to dismiss plaintiff Bridgestone/Firestone Inc.’s action for discovery against them and directed that the requested discovery “proceed forthwith.” They have argued (1) that the trial court incorrectly denied their motion to dismiss because Bridgestone/Firestone was attempting to use this action for discovery to determine whether it had causes of action against them rather than to discover a fact without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Poulos v. Parker Sweeper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Cooper Farms Cooked MeatsOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Natl. City Bank, N.E. v. AmediaOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Tilr Corp. v. TalentNow, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Sizemore v. Esis, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Stepp v. Wiseco Piston Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API