Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 14, 1976No. 57834PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

340 So.2d 208 (1976)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Roy CLARK, Jr., et al.

No. 57834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 14, 1976.

Rehearing Denied November 23, 1976.

James J. Gleason, III, St. Tammany Parish Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for Brent Mikell.

Ernest Prieto, Mandeville, Thomas A. Lussen, Jr., Baton Rouge, for Roy Clark, Jr.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Woodrow W. Erwin, Dist. Atty., Julian J. Rodrigue, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

MARCUS, Justice.

Roy Clark, Jr. and Brent Mikell were indicted by the grand jury for the Parish of St.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BourqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. State v. JuniorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. State v. SheppardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API