Legal Opinion
Tesler v. Paramount Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 26, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered October 15, 1993, which denied defendant insurer’s motion to renew a prior order declaring that defendant is obligated to defend plaintiff insureds in the underlying action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Renewal was properly denied since the Workers’ Compensation Board decision upon which defendant relies had been in existence for almost 18 months prior to defendant’s initial motion for summary judgment, and should have been brought to the court’s attention at that time (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568). In any event, even if…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- 875 Forest Ave. Corp. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- De Almeida v. FinesodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Macro Enterprises, Ltd. v. QBE InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Great American E&S InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cohen Bros. Realty Corp. v. RLI Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Cohen Bros. Realty Corp. v. RLI Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017