Legal Opinion

Bell v. Cassem

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 13, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Foreclosure proceedings. In the Circuit Court of Kendall County; the Hon. Clark W. Upton, Judge, presiding. Decree for complainants; error by defendants. Heard in this court at the May term, 1894,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harker

The defendant in error, Eels O. Cassem, filed his bill in chancery to foreclose a mortgage, executed December 21, 1889, by Albertina Helmuth and Jacob Helmuth, upon certain premises owned by Albertina Helmuth, and known as the “ City Hotel ” property, Yorkville, Illinois, to secure a loan of $2,000, made by him to the Helmuths. Sarah Bell and her five children, plaintiffs in error, were made defendants, because of an unsatisfied judgment for $5,000, recovered by them December 22, 1891, against Jacob Helmuth and Albertina Helmuth, for damages suffered by them by reason of the death of Arthur…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Stuart v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaby v. HankinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API