Legal Opinion

Moore v. McMillen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Steuben Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

This case comes up on the evidence. The jury may have inferred from it the following facts, viz: that L. Moore, D. McMillen, J. Paul, and Mary Hall, wife of James Hall, owned, as tenants in common, a flouring mill, upon which there was an incumbrance by way of mortgage; that they jointly borrowed of Peter McMillen $100 to pay on said mortgage, and which was so paid,.being the $100 to recover which this suit was brought.

On these facts the jury found a verdict against said parties for the $100, with interest.

J. A. Woodhull, for appellant. Chapin $ Croxton, for appellee.

The court rendered a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox's Adm'r v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lindley v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API