Legal Opinion

Hoggson Bros. v. First Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1916No. 4433PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Mexico; William H. Pope, Judge. Action by Hoggson Bros, against the First National Bank of Roswell.

1Opinion of the Court

CARLAND, Circuit Judge.

Hoggson Bros., hereinafter called plaintiff, sued the First National Bank of Roswell, New Mexico, hereinafter called the Bank, to recover for services rendered and expenses disbursed in connection with four alleged contracts, dated April 21, 1906, June 22, 1907, August 24, 1907, and December 8, 1908. A jury was waived and the action tried by the court. Special findings of fact were made, upon which judgment was rendered in favor of the Bank. Plaintiff brings the case here, assigning as error that on the facts found the judgment should have been in its favor.

The trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wells v. Hartford Manilla Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States Potash Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. City of Del Rio v. Ulen Contracting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  4. Mintle v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API