Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Inman
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 2008No. 03-1189Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
252 S.W.3d 299 (2008)
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
Bill INMAN, David Castro, and John Wilkins, Each Individually and on Behalf of all others Similarly Situated, Respondents.
No. 03-1189.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Argued January 6, 2005.
Decided February 1, 2008.
Rehearing Dismissed April 4, 2008.
William V. Dorsaneo III, Richard A. Smith, Lynn Tillotson & Pinker, L.L.P., Dallas, Mike A. Hatchell, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP, Molly H. Hatchell, Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP, Austin, TX, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, Audrey Mullert Vicknair, Law…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hecht.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.