Legal Opinion

Baggett v. Riley Huffstetler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Hardeman County Court; W. S. Banister, Judge. Action by Riley & Huffstetler against E. B. Baggett. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPresler, J.

Appellant, from the record, appears to have filed no briefs in this cause, and the same is submitted upon the brief of appellee, prepared in accordance with "rule 42 (142 S. W. xiv), governing the submission of cases in this court. We are of the opinion that the judgment in this cause should he affirmed. Appellant appears to have filed but one assignment in the court below, which, ' as contained in the transcript and presented in appellee’s brief, raises a question of jurisdiction by exception to the third count of appellee’s petition. In the trial, however, this count of the petition was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reece v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Lucky Hill Oil v. C. T. EvertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API