Legal Opinion

Carey v. Aurand

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1923No. 10,627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheafor

This suit was commenced by defendant in error against plaintiffs in error as officers and directors of The Thoro Products Manufacturing Company, a corporation, to recover a debt of the corporation, contracted in 1920, and for which judgment was rendered against the corporation in 1921. Trial in the county court, to the court without a jury, and judgment for defendant in error. The plaintiffs in error bring the case here for review. The parties will' be designated here as in the court below.

The annual report of the corporation, for the year 1920, was made and verified by the affidavit of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knoll v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Moody v. Rhodes Ranch Egg Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Perini v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bergren v. Valentine Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API