Legal Opinion

Lamborn v. Allen Kirkpatrick & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1926No. Appeal, 102PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The verdict and judgment in this case represent the damages which a jury assessed against defendant for breach of a contract to purchase and pay for sugar sold to it by plaintiffs, who were brokers in that and other commodities.

The contract was in writing and the parts of it which are here of concern recite that plaintiffs, on April 29, 1920, sold to appellant “300 bags (of about 224 lbs. each) five per cent more or less Java white sugars at $21.51 per 100 pounds duty paid, net exdock, New York, plus 1%%, for handling charges. Shipment to be made during…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Second Nat. Bank of Allegheny v. Lash Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  5. McDonald Construction Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. Conneaut Lake Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Atlantic City Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Southwark Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. McCormick v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Greenough v. MunroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Atlantic City Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Southwark Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API