Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dees v. Metts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 3, 1944No. 1 Div. 186Published

1DissentBouldin, Justice

Prevention of race amalgamation, safeguarding the racial integrity of white peoples and the racial integrity of negro peoples, is the fixed public policy of Alabama.

It is written into our Constitution in these words: “The legislature shall never pass any law to authorize or legalize any marriage between any white person and a negro, or descendant of a negro.” Article IV, § 102, Constitution of 1901.

It finds legislative expression in our miscegenation statute, which reads: “If any white person and any negro, or the descendant any negro intermarry, or live in ■adultery or fornication with each…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Shipman v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Allen v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Dunlap v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  5. Story v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API