Legal Opinion

Christopher v. . Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, C. J.

The validity of the title offered depends largely on the correct interpretation of clause 2 of the will' of Elizabeth Huneycutt, former owner, in terms as follows:

“I give and devise to my beloved grandchildren (the children of my deceased daughter, Mary A. C. Eigler), viz., Sarah Elizabeth Eigler, Minnie Louisa Eigler, and Charles Edward Eigler, the house and lot fronting 45 feet on ‘O’ Street, adjoining the lot of John T. Sckenck and running back to the line of James F. Moody; and should either of my aforesaid grandchildren die without bodily heirs or before the age of twenty-one years, then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhyne v. Flint Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Hobgood v. . HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. James v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Robertson v. . RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Tate v. . AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API