Legal Opinion

Black Motor Co. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 22, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Judge.

The petitioner, Black Motor Company (hereinafter called Black), brings this original action to compel the judge of the Harlan Circuit Court to enter an order directing the release of certain funds to it.

Following receipt of our affirming mandate in Albert v. Black Motor Company, Ky., 357 S.W.2d 714 (1962), the respondent entered an order on motion of Greene and Sutton, attorneys for Black (the successful litigant through a derivative action by certain of its stockholders) allowing them a fee equal to 40% of all sums actually recovered. Meanwhile Albert, the unsuccessful party,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ison v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Kaufman v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  3. Albert v. Black Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. Curtis v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Black Motor Company v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Shelton v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API