Legal Opinion
International Fidelity Insurance v. Crosland
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 26, 1981No. 80 Civ. 6338 (GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
Plaintiff International Fidelity Insurance Company (“International”), an obligor of a $3000 immigrant delivery bond, posted pursuant to section 242(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), has brought this action seeking review of the defendants’ determination that the bond has been breached, and for an order canceling the bond. Having agreed that there are no genuine issues of fact to be tried, the parties have cross-moved for summary judgment.
Evangelo Hatzis (“Hatzis”), a Greek national, entered the United States illegally in November,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kiki Undies Corp., and Cross-Appellee v. Promenade Hosiery Mills, Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- International Fidelity Insurance v. CroslandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Kiki Undies Corporation v. Promenade Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- National Wildlife Federation v. BennDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morabito v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Ram v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Safety National Casualty Corp. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008