Legal Opinion

Trepanier v. National Amusements, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2003No. 121415, COA No. 224262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

655 N.W.2d 229 (2003)

Gary TREPANIER, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 121415, COA No. 224262.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 15, 2003.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 5, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. We note that the Court of Appeals application of a remedial preferential rule was unnecessary to its decision, because the court concluded that the plain language of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolan v. Continental Airlines/Continental ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Crowe v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API