Legal Opinion

Loral Corp. v. Sanders Associates, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 8, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-296 MMSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STIPULATION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in this takeover litigation, Loral Corporation (“Loral”) and LC Acquiring Corporation (“LC”), seek to purchase ten million shares of the outstanding common stock of defendant Sanders Associates, Inc. (“Sanders”). Plaintiffs moved for a temporary restraining order enjoining Sanders and defendant Charles M. Oberly, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, from seeking to enforce against them the Delaware Tender Offer Act, 8 Del.C.Ann. § 203 (1983). 1 Plaintiffs did not, however, request a hearing on the motion. Two days later,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kennecott Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Conoco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  4. Wylain, Inc. v. TRE Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
  5. Mesa Partners v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API