Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clark v. Austin

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 8, 1937Published

1ConcurrenceEllison, C. J.

(concurring). — I concur in the ultimate conclusion of the principal opinion, but am unable to agree to the reasoning by which.it is reached; and since I believe a decision on the theory of the opinion would lead us into fundamental error widely affecting our re lations with a co-ordinate branch of the State government, the General Assembly, I file this separate opinion.. The informations charge the respondents with contempt of this court, in that they severally practiced law before the Public Service Commission of this State without being licensed as attorneys, in violation of Sections 11692…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  3. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API