Legal Opinion
In re United Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 1956No. Nos. 11627, 11645PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
These are appeals from an order of the district court for the District of Delaware enforcing certain provisions of a voluntary plan submitted by The United Corporation and approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (“Act”), 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 79 et seq., 79k(e).
We are concerned only with that phase of the district court’s order which can-celled outstanding warrants of The United Corporation without compensation to the holders.1
Appeals, challenging the cancellation, have been taken to this court by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Intermountain Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. LeventrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Central & South West Utilities Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corp. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of United Corporation. Randolph Phillips and Joseph B. HymanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Environmental Action, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Matter of the United Corporation. Appeal of Herbert M. Diamond, in No. 11627. Appeal of General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corporation and Alfred A. Biddle, in No. 11645Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Environmental Action, Inc. v. Securities And Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990