United States v. Crispin Herra-Herra
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Crispin Herra-Herra appeals his conviction, following a jury trial for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Herra-Herra also appeals his 151-month sentence as substantively unreasonable. We affirm the district court. 1
I. BACKGROUND
The evidence at trial established that federal agents discovered Herra-Herra’s involvement in a methamphetamine distri- button conspiracy while investigating a particular Mexico-based drug trafficking organization. By virtue of a tracking device that was placed on a co-conspirator’s vehicle, as well as a “ping” tracking device for the phone…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GardelliniCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Patrick Lynn WalrathCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Thomas Scott CrosslandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Samuel ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Joe RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Price v. LewienDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.