Legal Opinion

United States v. Crispin Herra-Herra

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2017No. 16-3410PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Crispin Herra-Herra appeals his conviction, following a jury trial for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Herra-Herra also appeals his 151-month sentence as substantively unreasonable. We affirm the district court. 1

I. BACKGROUND

The evidence at trial established that federal agents discovered Herra-Herra’s involvement in a methamphetamine distri- button conspiracy while investigating a particular Mexico-based drug trafficking organization. By virtue of a tracking device that was placed on a co-conspirator’s vehicle, as well as a “ping” tracking device for the phone…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. GardelliniCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Patrick Lynn WalrathCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Thomas Scott CrosslandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Samuel ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Joe RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. Price v. LewienDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
  5. United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API