Legal Opinion

City Council of Augusta v. Williams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1950No. 16937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The Court of Appeals (in Case No. 32625) propounded the following question: “Is the authorized maintenance-by a municipality of a drainage system for the purpose of the drainage of surface water, as distinguished from a drainage system for the- purpose of handling sewage, a governmental or a ministerial function?” The answer is that it is a governmental function.

No. 16937. February 16, 1950. Fulcher & Fulcher, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Sell Jr., and Benning M. Grice, for person at interest, not party. C. Wesley Killebrew, contra. .

Certified question answered.

All…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Ozbolt v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Rome v. TurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Foster v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. City of MacOn v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Turk v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. The CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUSTA v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API