City Council of Augusta v. Williams
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
The Court of Appeals (in Case No. 32625) propounded the following question: “Is the authorized maintenance-by a municipality of a drainage system for the purpose of the drainage of surface water, as distinguished from a drainage system for the- purpose of handling sewage, a governmental or a ministerial function?” The answer is that it is a governmental function.
No. 16937. February 16, 1950. Fulcher & Fulcher, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Sell Jr., and Benning M. Grice, for person at interest, not party. C. Wesley Killebrew, contra. .
Certified question answered.
All…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Ozbolt v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Rome v. TurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Foster v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- City of MacOn v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Turk v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- The CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUSTA v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.