Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Platt v. Platt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1979No. 1799Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSpaeth, Judge

I agree that this case should be remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was properly committed for extended involuntary emergency treatment under 50 P.S. § 7301 et seq. (Supp. 1978-79). I also agree, but for different reasons explained below, that at that hearing appellant’s husband may testify. I disagree, however, regarding the ability of appellant’s psychiatrist to testify. Consequently, I concur in part and dissent in part.

*293-1-

On June 3,1978, appellant was admitted to the psychiatric ward of St. Joseph’s Hospital in Lancaster for involuntary emergency…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API