Legal Opinion
Lee v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 1985No. 84 Civ. 3407 (PNL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner, Homer Lee, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He claims that the actions of the United States Parole Commission in setting his presumptive parole date constituted an abuse of discretion and a violation of the Ex Post Facto clause. The Commission moves to dismiss.
Facts
In January, 1982, Lee pleaded guilty in the Southern District of Florida to one count of bank robbery. A second bank robbery charge was dropped as part of the plea bargain. On February 22, 1982, Lee was sentenced to a term of 20 years. He was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John J. Rodriguez v. United States Parole Commission and Metropolitan Correctional Center, Robert Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Billiteri v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Leon Robinson v. John T. Hadden, and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Miller v. QuinlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. John Farese 12136-054 v. Dennis Luther, Warden John FareseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Masselli v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United States of America Ex Rel. John Farese 12136-054 v. Dennis Luther, Warden John FareseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992