Legal Opinion
Hein-Muniz v. Aiken Regional Medical Centers
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 25, 2012No. C/A No. 1:10-cv-986-JFAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 228). Defendants assert, in their motion, that they are entitled to the damages immunity provided by the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (“HCQIA”) and summary judgment on the causes of action asserted by Plaintiffs in this suit. Plaintiffs oppose the motion and argue that, for a number of reasons, Defendants are not entitled to immunity under HCQIA. For the reasons that follow, this court grants Defendants’ Motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bryan v. James Holmes Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Imperial v. Suburban Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Meyers v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Moore v. Williamsburg Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Innosys, Inc. v. MercerUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Innosys, Inc. v. MercerUtah Supreme Court · 2015