State v. . Ashford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDICTMENT for obtaining money under false representations, tried before Ooble, Jand a jury, at Spring Term, 1897, of Anson Superior Court. The defendant was convicted and appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Faiecloth, C. J.:
The defendant was indicted for obtaining ‘‘money’’ under a false representation and the proof was that he obtained “goods and merchandise” under such representation. There were no exceptions, at the trial. After verdict the defendant' moved in arrest of judgment. On the argument here it was. insisted that the court, by looking through the whole record, would see that the judgment was such as should not in law be rendered under The Code, Section 957. No error was pointed out to the court by the defendant. The point made is that money was charged in the indictment and goods and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- State v. . CraigeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. . CowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Pierce v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.