Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Alkek
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided April 8, 1993No. 13-91-227-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NYE, Chief Justice.
We withdraw our former opinion and substitute the following. John and Henry Goldman (appellants) filed suit against Warren and Maureen Alkek to terminate a commercial lease, alleging breach of contract and fraud. The Goldmans also sought declaratory relief to establish that Alkek breached the lease. Warren Alkek counter-sued for damages, for a declaration of the amount of rent due under the lease, and a determination that he was not in default.
The parties tried the case to a jury. The Goldmans submitted their cause on breach of contract and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Cameron, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Moore v. Bank Midwest, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Kennedy v. King Soopers Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Equitable Recovery, L.P. v. Heath Insurance Brokers of Texas, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Weingarten Realty Investors v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.