Legal Opinion
Tuckson v. Clemmer
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1956No. 7147_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
231 F.2d 658
Rudolph TUCKSON, Appellant,
v.
Donald CLEMMER, Director, Department of Corrections for the
District of Columbia, Paul F. Pegelow, Superintendent, D.C.
Reformatory, and Jack B. Garrott, Chief, Institution Parole
Officer, D.C. Reformatory, Appellees.
No. 7147.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 19, 1956.
Decided April 9, 1956.
Rudolph Tuckson, pro se, on the brief.
Edwin J. Slipek, Asst. U.S. Atty, Richmond, Va. (L. S. Parsons, Jr., U.S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., and Harlan E. Freeman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellees.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. MemoloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Hurley v. Lindsay, Superintendent of Lorton ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Raymond v. Masterson v. Henry M. Lindsay, Superintendent, District ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Tuckson v. ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hogan v. LukhardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1972