Legal Opinion
Plumb v. Lavery & NH Cardiology
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided May 14, 2007No. 06-CV-278-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Plumb v . Lavery & NH Cardiology 06-CV-278-JD 5/14/07 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert and Priscilla Plumb v. Civil N o . 06-cv-278-JD Opinion N o .
2007 DNH 066
Robert Lavery and New Hampshire Cardiology Consultants, P.C. O R D E R Robert and Priscilla Plumb brought claims of medical malpractice, "informed consent," and loss of consortium against Dr. Robert Lavery and his employer, New Hampshire Cardiology Consultants, P.C., alleging that the treatment of Robert's atrial fibrillation was below the standard of care and caused stomach bleeding and permanent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Universal Communication Systems, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Wheeler v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aumand v. Dartmouth HitchcockDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007