Legal Opinion

Hicks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 3, 2009No. 05-1058CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEGRA, Judge.

Trial in this matter commenced in St. Louis, Missouri, on December 15, 2008, and continued in Washington, D.C., on January 23, 2009. Near the end of the proceedings, Hal D. Hicks (plaintiff) expressed a desire to call two rebuttal witnesses who were not listed on his pretrial witness list. On January 16, 2009, the court ordered plaintiff to file a memorandum explaining why such witnesses should be permitted to testify and, in particular, addressing whether such witnesses would be used “exclusively for impeachment” within the meaning of paragraph 15(a) of Appendix A to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Betty U. Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
Klonoski v. MahlabCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
Bearint Ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
Elion v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
Wendy Ferguson Sellers v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, John JosephCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Strahan v. EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2022