Legal Opinion

Stinnett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 2, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Reversing.

Appellant complains of the action of the lower court in overruling a demurrer to the indictment upon which he was prosecuted and convicted. The indictment reads r

“The grand jury in the county of Edmonson, in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Oliver Stinnett of the offense of unlawfully operating an illicit or moonshine still, committed as follows, to-wit: The said Stinnett heretofore to-wit: On the — day of-192— in the county aforesaid, did unlawfully operate an illicit still, commonly and exclusively used in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merdith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. Bowling Green Athletic ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Porter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API