Johnson v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKeller, Justice
I concur with the majority opinion to the extent that it holds that we should remand this case to the trial court with instructions for it to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding Johnson’s competency, but I would limit the scope of the hearing and determination to the question of whether Johnson was competent at the time of his sentencing. Johnson brought no pretrial motions regarding his competency before the trial court and, in fact, raised no issue involving his mental illness prior to the jury’s return with a guilty verdict. On December 30, 1997, Johnson, for the first time, brought an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Ruiz v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Adkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
- Jessup v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.