Washington, P. & C. Ry. Co. v. Magruder
District Court, D. Maryland
In Equity. Suit by the Washington, Potomac & Chesapeake Railway Company against W. Hampton Magruder, State’s Attorney for Prince Georges County, Robert C. Combs, State’s Attorney for St. Marys County, and Ferdinand C. Cooksey, State’s Attorney for Charles County, Maryland. On final hearing. Decree for complainant.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
Complainant is a Maryland corporation. Defendants are the state’s attorneys for the counties of Prince Georges, St. Marys, and Charles. The controversy turns upon the validity of an act of assembly of Maryland approved April 11, 1910 (Eaws 1910, c. 200). It requires the Washington, Potomac & Chesapeake Railroad Company “or any other Railroad Company by whatsoever name it may operate * * * which may operate the track and rolling stock of the said Washington, Potomac & Chesapeake Railroad Company” to “operate two accommodation trains daily each way (Sunday excepted) over…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Washington Ex Rel. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Commonwealth v. RohrerLancaster County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1937
- M/V "SOUTH AFRICAN VICTORY"Board of Immigration Appeals · 1967