Legal Opinion

In re Cross

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1922No. 4135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Wilfred M. Cross, bankrupt. On withdrawal of claim for exemption by bankrupt and rule by Tinkler & Co., Inc., a creditor, on John R. Hessel, trustee, to set aside exemptions.

1Opinion of the Court

WITHER, District Judge.

At the time the petition in bankruptcy was filed, the goods of the bankrupt were under levy upon execution of Tinkler & Co., Inc., in which there was waiver of the exemption. The bankrupt claimed certain specified goods under the exemption in his schedules filed, but shortly thereafter, upon the election of a trustee, the bankrupt filed a disclaimer to the exemption of the property enumerated in his schedules, and requested that amendment be noted accordingly. Tinkler & Co., Inc., the execution creditors, resist the amendment of the schedules and insist that they be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appeal of the Overseers of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. In re BaughmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Sutman v. HogsettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Kyle & Dunlap's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. IH KENT COMPANY v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In re MattinglyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  3. In re AnostosDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API