Legal Opinion

Adams v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 12, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01014Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LUKE ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-CV-1014-SCD ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Luke Adams seeks Social Security disability benefits based on various mental impairments. Following a hearing, an administrative law judge determined that Adams was not disabled because he could still work despite certain mental-health limitations. Adams now seeks judicial review of that decision, arguing that the ALJ erred in evaluating his alleged symptoms, weighing the opinions of his treating therapist,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Joseph A. Zurawski v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, .Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Lorenzo Lopez, on Behalf of Roberta Lopez, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API