Legal Opinion
Roeser & Pendleton, Inc. v. StanoLind Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 15, 1940No. 5461PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Chief Justice.
This suit was filed by appellee, Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, in trespass to try title to the ⅞ leasehold mineral interests in ten acres of land located in Marion County, against Sterling C. Holloway, M. H. Overlees, and Roeser & Pendleton, Inc. Holloway and Overlees disclaimed any interest in the land and were dismissed from the suit. Roeser & Pendleton, Inc., answered by- general demurrer, general denial and a plea of not guilty. Trial to the court without a jury resulted in judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed.
The facts material to the issues…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKamey v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Grace v. Wade & MainsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Parker v. G. Y. Coop.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Blankenship v. DouglasTexas Supreme Court · 1862
- First State Bank of Amarillo v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Texas American Bank/Levelland v. Resendez, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
- Jensen v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Bailey v. MullensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- In the Matter of Dallas Cabana, Inc., Bankrupt. Dallas Cabana, Inc. v. Wilson F. Collier, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Hammett v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.