Legal Opinion

State v. Cales

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 23, 2006No. AC 25399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Norberto Cales, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after *534a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136, criminal trespass in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-108 and assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (1). The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court inadequately instructed the jury on the defendant’s theory of defense. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On November 4, 2003,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Kramer v. PetisiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. State v. CampfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Michael T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Starr v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. WestConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API