Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Means

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1929No. 939—5046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShobt, P. J.

The defendant in error J. S. Means owned a certain lot in an addition to the city of Dallas. He executed a power of attorney to Nathan Powell to sell and convey it for any sum of money or other consideration and on such terms as to Powell might seem most to Means’ advantage, and to receive the consideration for which the lot might be sold, and to execute proper receipts, releases, and acquittances, and to execute to the purchaser a deed, giving to said Powell other general powers customary to he given in a general power of attorney. The substance of this power of attorney is embraced in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaston & Ayres v. J. I. Campbell Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Kiser v. AustinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Means v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Plummer v. BuckNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Industrial Acceptance Corp. v. CoreyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Cruz v. First Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Cruz v. First Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Southwestern Fire & Casualty Company v. LarueTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Southwestern Fire & Casualty Company v. LarueTexas Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API