Legal Opinion

Browney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1934No. 16471Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In the motion for rehearing counsel *90for the State appears to be in accord with the announcement in the original opinion to the effect that, generally in the trial of an accomplice to an offense, the confession of the principal is not admissible where such principal is a competent witness against the accomplice and testifies, acknowledging his guilt. It is insisted, however, that the confession of Barrow, the principal, became admissible by virtue of the fact that appellant cross-examined him as to certain matters embraced in the confession, and further,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Earnest v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API