Grimes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON THE STATE’S AND APPELLANT BARNEY STAGGNER’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DICE, Judge.
Motions for rehearing have been filed by both the state and the appellant Barney Staggner, the state insisting that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction of the appellant R. B. Grimes which was reversed on original submission, and the appellant Staggner insisting that his conviction which was affirmed should be reversed because of the insufficiency of the evidence and certain errors in the court’s charge. No motion for rehearing has been filed by the appellant Scott Davis.
We have again examined the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dukes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- McFaddin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957