Wright v. Proffitt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Brailsford, Justice:
The taxpayer’s action challenges the constitutionality of Act No. 687 of the Acts of 1969, which created the Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict (hereinafter called “the subdistrict”) of the Greenville County Sewer Authority, and Act No. 1842 of the Acts of 1972, which authorized the issuance of up to $10,000,000.00 in bonds by the subdistrict. The members o,f the subdistrict’s governing board (the Commission) and the Attorney General are defendants.
•' The Greenville County Sewer Authority (formerly the. Greater Greenville Sewer District) is a special taxing district of almost…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Branson v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- J.K. Construction, Inc. v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Casey v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Torgerson v. CraverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Yeargin v. ANDERSON CNTY. COUNCILSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Wicker v. Anderson County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988