Legal Opinion

Wright v. Proffitt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 2, 1973No. 19671PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice:

The taxpayer’s action challenges the constitutionality of Act No. 687 of the Acts of 1969, which created the Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict (hereinafter called “the subdistrict”) of the Greenville County Sewer Authority, and Act No. 1842 of the Acts of 1972, which authorized the issuance of up to $10,000,000.00 in bonds by the subdistrict. The members o,f the subdistrict’s governing board (the Commission) and the Attorney General are defendants.

•' The Greenville County Sewer Authority (formerly the. Greater Greenville Sewer District) is a special taxing district of almost…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Branson v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J.K. Construction, Inc. v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Casey v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Torgerson v. CraverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Yeargin v. ANDERSON CNTY. COUNCILSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Wicker v. Anderson County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API